Free Essays on Labour Governments In The 1960’s And 1970’s.

Labour Governments In The 1960’s And 1970’s Were Widely Seen As Failing To Fulfill Labour Party Aims And Aspirations. How Far Was This True And, If So, Why? Answered With Reference To The 1964-70 Government The Labour government between 1964 and 1970 has been accused of failing to fulfill the aims and aspirations of the Labour party. Whether this accusation was justified relies heavily on how many difficulties Labour caused for themselves whilst in power, and how many they inherited from their Conservative predecessors. Their overly optimistic aims combined with an emphasis on planning (rather than action) is what they have been mainly criticized for, but the disastrous state of the economy that they were unexpectedly faced with also caused them many problems. Labour’s programme in 1964 was: (1) the active management of the economy using the instruments of fiscal policy, indicative planning and prices and incomes policy to accelerate economic growth, foster the planned and equitable rise of incomes and maintain full employment (2) the enhancement of social justice and equality via a more progressive tax system and expanded public programmes on health, housing, personal social services and education to be financed mainly by the increments of faster economic growth Wilson’s election manifesto in 1964 focused heavily on economic planning as a solution to Britain’s ailing economy. By the late 1950’s the economy was under increasing pressure from abroad as it became apparent that it was in relative decline compared with the faster growing economies of Germany, France and the rest of Western Europe. Sterling became particularly vulnerable after it was made fully convertible in 1958 so the government had less room for maneuver. Labour began to focus all their policies on defending the pound, as they viewed devaluation as the ultimate defeat and humiliation for Britain. However, the concentration on ‘planning’ ... Free Essays on Labour Governments In The 1960’s And 1970’s. Free Essays on Labour Governments In The 1960’s And 1970’s. Labour Governments In The 1960’s And 1970’s Were Widely Seen As Failing To Fulfill Labour Party Aims And Aspirations. How Far Was This True And, If So, Why? Answered With Reference To The 1964-70 Government The Labour government between 1964 and 1970 has been accused of failing to fulfill the aims and aspirations of the Labour party. Whether this accusation was justified relies heavily on how many difficulties Labour caused for themselves whilst in power, and how many they inherited from their Conservative predecessors. Their overly optimistic aims combined with an emphasis on planning (rather than action) is what they have been mainly criticized for, but the disastrous state of the economy that they were unexpectedly faced with also caused them many problems. Labour’s programme in 1964 was: (1) the active management of the economy using the instruments of fiscal policy, indicative planning and prices and incomes policy to accelerate economic growth, foster the planned and equitable rise of incomes and maintain full employment (2) the enhancement of social justice and equality via a more progressive tax system and expanded public programmes on health, housing, personal social services and education to be financed mainly by the increments of faster economic growth Wilson’s election manifesto in 1964 focused heavily on economic planning as a solution to Britain’s ailing economy. By the late 1950’s the economy was under increasing pressure from abroad as it became apparent that it was in relative decline compared with the faster growing economies of Germany, France and the rest of Western Europe. Sterling became particularly vulnerable after it was made fully convertible in 1958 so the government had less room for maneuver. Labour began to focus all their policies on defending the pound, as they viewed devaluation as the ultimate defeat and humiliation for Britain. However, the concentration on ‘planning’ ...

Basic Facts About the Vietnam War

Basic Facts About the Vietnam War The Vietnam War occurred in present-day Vietnam, Southeast Asia. It represented a successful attempt on the part of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North Vietnam, DRV) and the National Front for the Liberation of Vietnam (Viet Cong) to unite and impose a communist system over the entire nation. Opposing the DRV was the Republic of Vietnam (South Vietnam, RVN), backed by the United States. The war in Vietnam occurred during the Cold War and is generally viewed as an indirect conflict between the United States and Soviet Union  with each nation and its allies supporting one side. Vietnam War Dates The most commonly used dates for the conflict are 1959-1975. This period begins with North Vietnams first guerilla attacks against the South and ends with the fall of Saigon. American ground forces were directly involved in the war between 1965 and 1973. Vietnam War Causes The Vietnam War first began in 1959, five years after the division of the country by the Geneva Accords. Vietnam had been divided into two, with a communist regime in the north under Ho Chi Minh and a democratic government in the south under Ngo Dinh Diem. In 1959, Ho commenced a guerilla campaign in South Vietnam, led by Viet Cong units, with the goal of reuniting the country under a communist government. These guerilla units often found support among the rural population who desired land reform.   Worried about the situation, the Kennedy Administration elected to increase aid to South Vietnam. As part of the larger goal of containing the spread of communism, the United States endeavored to train the Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN) and supplied military advisors to aid in combating the guerrillas. Though the flow of aid increased, President John F. Kennedy did not wish to use ground forces in Vietnam as he believed their presence would cause adverse political consequences.   Americanization of the Vietnam War In August 1964, a US warship was attacked by North Vietnamese torpedo boats in the Gulf of Tonkin. Following this attack, Congress passed the Southeast Asia Resolution which allowed President Lyndon Johnson to conduct military operations in the region without a declaration of war. On March 2, 1965, US aircraft commenced bombing targets in Vietnam and the first troops arrived. Moving forward under Operations Rolling Thunder and Arc Light, American aircraft began systematic bombing strikes on North Vietnamese industrial sites, infrastructure, and air defenses. On the ground, US troops, commanded by General William Westmoreland, defeated Viet Cong and North Vietnamese forces around Chu Lai and in the Ia Drang Valley that year.   The Tet Offensive Following these defeats, the North Vietnamese elected to avoid fighting conventional battles and focused on engaging US troops in small unit actions in the sweltering jungles of South Vietnam. As fighting continued, leaders Hanoi contentiously debated how to move forward as American air strikes were beginning to severely damage their economy. Deciding to resume more conventional operations, planning began for a large-scale operation. In January 1968, the North Vietnamese and the Viet Cong commenced the massive Tet Offensive. Opening with an assault on US Marines at Khe Sanh, the offensive featured attacks by the Viet Cong on cities throughout South Vietnam. Combat exploded throughout the country and saw ARVN forces hold their ground. Over the next two months, American and ARVN troops  were able to turn back the Viet Cong assault, with particularly heavy fighting in the cities of Hue and Saigon. Though the North Vietnamese were beaten with heavy casualties, Tet shook the confidence of the American people and media who had thought the war was going well. Vietnamization As a result of Tet, President Lyndon Johnson chose not to run for reelection and was succeeded by Richard Nixon. Nixons plan for ending US participation in the war was to build up the ARVN so that they could fight the war themselves. As this process of â€Å"Vietnamization† began, US troops started to return home. The mistrust of Washington that had begun after Tet increased with the release of news about bloody battles of questionable value such as Hamburger Hill (1969). Protests against the war and US policy in Southeast Asia further intensified with events such as soldiers massacring civilians at My Lai (1969), the invasion of Cambodia (1970), and the leaking of the Pentagon Papers (1971).   End of the War and the Fall of Saigon The withdrawal of US troops continued and more responsibility was passed to the ARVN, which continued to prove ineffective in combat, often relying on American support to stave off defeat. On January 27, 1974, a peace accord was signed in Paris ending the conflict. By March of that year, American combat troops had left the country. After a brief period of peace, North Vietnam recommenced hostilities in late 1974. Pushing through ARVN forces with ease, they captured the Saigon on April 30, 1975, forcing South Vietnam’s surrender and reuniting the country.   Casualties United States: 58,119 killed, 153,303 wounded, 1,948 missing in action South Vietnam 230,000 killed and 1,169,763 wounded (estimated) North Vietnam 1,100,000 killed in action (estimated) and an unknown number of wounded Key Figures Ho Chi Minh – Communist leader of North Vietnam until his death in 1969.Vo Nguyen Giap – North Vietnamese general who planned the Tet and Easter Offensives.General William Westmoreland – Commander of US forces in Vietnam, 1964-1968.General Creighton Abrams – Commander of US forces in Vietnam, 1968-1973.